The Makah tribe claim to have hunted gray whales for more than 2,000 years. They stopped in the 1920s due to a decline in the number of gray whales. Now they want to return to the hunt to provide food for their tribe and to restore the men’s sense of discipline and pride in their traditions. Proponents of the hunt claim that a majority of the tribe support the hunt, which is expected to take fewer than the five whales they are permitted by law to kill. Tribal leaders claim they will take no pregnant or nursing
females. Some Makah elders disagree, however pointing out that the tribe survived for most of the
twentieth century without eating whale meat and claiming that there are better ways to instill pride and
discipline. The environmental community argues that the whale hunt is immoral because it violates the
whales’ right to exist on the planet. Is it appropriate for nonmembers of the Makah tribe—for example,
students in your class—-to evaluate the morality of the Makah whale hunt? Explain.
For this module, you are required to complete a Written Case Analysis which will be assessed for depth
and breadth. Please read Thinking Critically About Ethical Issues, Case 1, p. 60. Identify the moral issue(s)
and the parties involved. Discuss the moral issues you have identified in terms of two the following:
utility, duties, rights.
Your analysis should be approximately 500 words in length and all sources should be cited properly
using MLA format. Information on the MLA guidelines is accessible via the Resources area of the Course
Home menu. Use a standard 10- 12 pt. font and double space your pape